<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Come on Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/</link>
	<description>Stuff and Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:13:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ringonian</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15760</link>
		<dc:creator>ringonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-15760</guid>
		<description>it seems like all the mapping sites including mapquest and livemaps is following suit at this time.  i haven&#039;t found any site that would route 66 inside the beltway. my guess is because of the liability involved with directing drivers the wrong direction; after incidents of gps devices navigating people at dead ends, train tracks, etc. then getting sued for it.  they should at least have a check box that says &quot;Restricted Route&quot; defaulted to off.  then when the user selects it, pop up a disclaimer before continuing with the restricted route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems like all the mapping sites including mapquest and livemaps is following suit at this time.  i haven&#8217;t found any site that would route 66 inside the beltway. my guess is because of the liability involved with directing drivers the wrong direction; after incidents of gps devices navigating people at dead ends, train tracks, etc. then getting sued for it.  they should at least have a check box that says &#8220;Restricted Route&#8221; defaulted to off.  then when the user selects it, pop up a disclaimer before continuing with the restricted route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15749</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-15749</guid>
		<description>Worked when I moved here in late feb 2010, noticed a few weeks ago it was broken. Grrr... Really wish they would fix this once in for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worked when I moved here in late feb 2010, noticed a few weeks ago it was broken. Grrr&#8230; Really wish they would fix this once in for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15714</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-15714</guid>
		<description>@Andrew - sometime in 2008 Google started allowing use of 66 inside the Beltway.

and then....
@Dale - sometime in late 2009, early 2010 they stopped allowing it!

Agh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew &#8211; sometime in 2008 Google started allowing use of 66 inside the Beltway.</p>
<p>and then&#8230;.<br />
@Dale &#8211; sometime in late 2009, early 2010 they stopped allowing it!</p>
<p>Agh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15588</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-15588</guid>
		<description>STILL no option to use I-66 in Google Maps... it avoids it like the plague. VERY annoying. Mapquest and Live Maps have no trouble with it. What ever happened to &quot;Don&#039;t be evil&quot;, Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STILL no option to use I-66 in Google Maps&#8230; it avoids it like the plague. VERY annoying. Mapquest and Live Maps have no trouble with it. What ever happened to &#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221;, Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Ness</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-14443</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-14443</guid>
		<description>I fought with MapQuest, and it appears that it, also hates I-66 as well as the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge, and tries to avoid them at all cost.  I imagine they are worried that a lone driver might map a route that uses it, and try to follow the directions during HOV-time (and then demand that MapQuest pay the $80 ticket!).  They need a checkbox under &quot;Direction Options&quot;, such as &quot;Use HOV routes where possible&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fought with MapQuest, and it appears that it, also hates I-66 as well as the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge, and tries to avoid them at all cost.  I imagine they are worried that a lone driver might map a route that uses it, and try to follow the directions during HOV-time (and then demand that MapQuest pay the $80 ticket!).  They need a checkbox under &#8220;Direction Options&#8221;, such as &#8220;Use HOV routes where possible&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Zitnay</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9647</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Zitnay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-9647</guid>
		<description>Looks like Google Maps finally allows the use of 66 inside the beltway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Google Maps finally allows the use of 66 inside the beltway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9506</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-9506</guid>
		<description>this is totally trus.  i know this is late, but i had to google it since i cannot even drag my route onto 66 west from DC.  really bizzarre!  takes me out 50 or up GW pkwy to beltway then down and around.  really annoying b/c i know i want to go out 66, just dont know where the exit is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is totally trus.  i know this is late, but i had to google it since i cannot even drag my route onto 66 west from DC.  really bizzarre!  takes me out 50 or up GW pkwy to beltway then down and around.  really annoying b/c i know i want to go out 66, just dont know where the exit is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Sinha</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9298</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Sinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-9298</guid>
		<description>I live in the DC area and love using Google Maps but hate (I know Hate is a strong word) the fact that Google Map refuses to use I-66. So I just end up using Maps.Live.Com

I wish someone at Google maps would take note of this :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the DC area and love using Google Maps but hate (I know Hate is a strong word) the fact that Google Map refuses to use I-66. So I just end up using Maps.Live.Com</p>
<p>I wish someone at Google maps would take note of this <img src='http://www.btjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksu499</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9284</link>
		<dc:creator>ksu499</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-9284</guid>
		<description>I just received a Garmin C330 and going home from work last night it was doing everything possible to keep me off I-66 (Tysons to Arlington/Ballston).  Once I got home, in the setup I found a checkbox that when unchecked allows carpool lanes.  Unchecked it.  This morning, it used I-66 to get me back to Tysons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received a Garmin C330 and going home from work last night it was doing everything possible to keep me off I-66 (Tysons to Arlington/Ballston).  Once I got home, in the setup I found a checkbox that when unchecked allows carpool lanes.  Unchecked it.  This morning, it used I-66 to get me back to Tysons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/come-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btjones.com/2007/07/17/come-on-google/#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>I believe it may also have something to do with the fact that trucks are not allowed inside the beltway on 66.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it may also have something to do with the fact that trucks are not allowed inside the beltway on 66.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.807 seconds -->
